Difference between revisions of "Dual Funded Channels"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Please help by adding more information. Suggestion:
MiltonPusser (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{TODO|Explain more}} In a dual-funded channel, party A would fund a channel with 0.1 BTC if party B also funds a channel with 0.1 BTC, this comes with cost: opening a channe...") |
MiltonPusser (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{HELP|Explain more}} | ||
In a dual-funded channel, party A would fund a channel with 0.1 BTC if party B also funds a channel with 0.1 BTC, this comes with cost: opening a channel requires an on-chain transaction and opportunity cost (of the capital committed). However, party B can earn routing fees, earned by merit of providing liquidity to the network. | In a dual-funded channel, party A would fund a channel with 0.1 BTC if party B also funds a channel with 0.1 BTC, this comes with cost: opening a channel requires an on-chain transaction and opportunity cost (of the capital committed). However, party B can earn routing fees, earned by merit of providing liquidity to the network. |
Latest revision as of 14:05, 28 February 2019
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Explain more
In a dual-funded channel, party A would fund a channel with 0.1 BTC if party B also funds a channel with 0.1 BTC, this comes with cost: opening a channel requires an on-chain transaction and opportunity cost (of the capital committed). However, party B can earn routing fees, earned by merit of providing liquidity to the network.